a MENU
a -------------------------

a INDEX
a THE DDI STORY
a CURRENT DIRECTORY
a DDI COVERS GALLERY
a ADVERTISER INFO
a CONTACT
a MARKETPLACE

a ----------------------

m Massad

m Bootlovers Online

m

 

iBehind the Scenes

For years and years faithful readers have wondered about the ownership and infrastructure behind the scenes at DDI magazine. Who is the publisher, and is he or she into SM and bondage? Does the office staff wear leather to work? These queries are partly due to the fact that our co-publishers and editorial staff are not ones to self-aggrandize. DDI is about dominant woman and the professional dominance scene, not about the overworked souls who put the pages together. You will never pick up a copy of DDI and see our founding publisher pictured in sartorial splendor on the editorial page, smugly seated with a rubber girl on one knee and a leather lady on the other. That's definitely not going to happen.

Until very recently DDI did not print a masthead. To the uninitiated, this is the small section usually occupying part or all of one page near the front of any magazine, detailing the parent ownership, publisher, editors, and contributing staff of the periodical. Beginning with DDI's recently merged, world edition, issue #49, we now sport such an informative masthead. It reads as follows...

DDI was founded by David Jackson, but currently the magazine is co-published by both Mr. Jackson and a colleague, Bert Wibo, DDI's European chief. Both publishers created fetish-and-B&D magazines prior to DDI, and still do, so of course they have an appreciation for the fetish scene as a whole. The question of whether they are personally dom, sub, or indifferent to sexual power games is a question you won't get an answer to. DDI is known for its discretion, both for its advertisers and readers, as well as towards itself. To satisfy the more inquisitive and fanciful of our DDI readers, though, here are some answers to your most prevalent queries...

Q: Is it true that the publisher checks out each mistress individually and has a session with her before she can be accepted into DDI?

A: No. Not true. The publishers try to visit as many of the advertisers as they can, but not for a session. It's simply a courtesy. There is no test a mistress must pass to advertise in DDI. Neither do the publishers send anyone out to represent them. If anyone goes to a dominatrix, other than David Jackson or Bert Wibo, claiming to work for DDI, don't believe them.

Q: I heard DDI hires only women staff and they all have to wear fetish gear at the office. Is that for real?

A: Totally false. DDI's editorial offices in Palm Springs and Rotterdam are places of business, not fetish party venues. Yes, most of the staff is female. No, they do not dress like DDI cover models.

Q: There's a rumor that the DDI publisher dates a lot of the doms in the magazine. That true?

A: Again, false. DDI's publishing policy towards its advertisers, no matter how bright or beautiful they may be, is, "Friendly to all, intimate with none!" DDI publishing staff plays no favorites and does not fraternize.

Q: Does DDI's publisher own Skin Two magazine?

A: No. Skin Two is owned and published by TW Publishing, located in London, England. Mr. Tim Woodward is the publisher. Diversicor, Inc., parent corporation of DDI, does have vested interest in the wholesale distribution and retail sale of Skin Two, however. The publishers of DDI and Skin Two are close friends and associates.

Q: I was told that you sometimes refuse some mistresses from advertising and have even kicked a couple out of the magazine before. Is this accurate?

A: Yes, it is. We probably refuse one prospective ad request for every one accepted. Refusals are based on key indicators such as gross insincerity, total lack of equipment, wardrobe or experience, obvious indications of substance abuse or criminal intent, etc. We have indeed recommended that one or two of our DDI advertisers over the years seek their advertising opportunities elsewhere. We won't name them, but these individuals are out of DDI for good.

<<back xxxx next>>